Skip to content

Original Data & Framework

Shared vs Exclusive Roofing Leads: ROI Model

Direct Answer

Are exclusive roofing leads worth more than shared leads?

This model compares the estimated ROI of shared versus exclusive roofing leads by adjusting each for its effective close rate and price. Exclusive leads usually cost more per lead but convert at a higher rate because you aren't racing competitors; shared leads cost less but are diluted. The model shows estimated net value per dollar for each, based on inputs you provide.

Purpose

Roofers constantly debate whether exclusive leads justify their premium. This model replaces gut feel with a transparent comparison so owners can see, on their own numbers, which lead type returns more per dollar.

Compare on net value, not price

A cheaper lead isn't better if it rarely closes. The model converts price and close rate into estimated net value per dollar so shared and exclusive leads can be compared on the same footing.

Your numbers drive it

You supply average job value, the close rate you see for each lead type, and the price you pay. Industry averages aren't substituted, because roofing lead economics vary widely.

Inputs

Average job value
Typical revenue per completed roofing job.
Shared-lead close rate
Your historical close rate on shared leads.
Exclusive-lead close rate
Your historical close rate on exclusive leads.
Price per lead (each type)
What you pay per shared and per exclusive lead.

How the calculation works

Net value per lead = (Average job value × Close rate) − Price per lead Value per dollar = Net value per lead ÷ Price per lead The model runs this for shared and exclusive inputs and compares the two value-per-dollar figures.

Example calculation

Shared: (12,000 × 0.06) − 75$645 net / $75 = 8.6×
Exclusive: (12,000 × 0.14) − 350$1,330 net / $350 = 3.8×
Shared net value per lead$645
Exclusive net value per lead$1,330
InterpretationExclusive yields more net value per lead in this example

Assumptions & disclaimer

  • Close rates are assumed stable and come from your own history.
  • The model ignores time/labor cost of working diluted shared leads, so it may favor shared leads.
  • Referral and repeat value are excluded, which can understate exclusive-lead value.
  • This report is designed to become RooferFuel.ai's ongoing benchmark dataset. Until live client data is available, calculations are based on disclosed assumptions and should be treated as estimates, not guaranteed outcomes.

This ROI model produces planning estimates from your inputs. It does not guarantee close rates, ROI, or revenue for either lead type. Results vary by market, offer, response speed, and factors outside RooferFuel.ai's control.

Frequently Asked Questions

No. If your exclusive close rate isn't meaningfully higher, the premium may not pay off. The model shows where the breakeven is for your numbers.
Shared leads punish slow response hardest because competitors are calling the same homeowner. Faster follow-up narrows the gap.
Use your own last-12-months figures by lead type. Estimates are fine, but the output is only as good as the inputs.

Related Pages

Data & Reports

Find your real lead ROI

Book a free audit and we'll run your shared and exclusive numbers through the model and show you which returns more.

Last updated: